Government vendor

NAMPAPALA COMPANY

Procurement record only — not registry-verified. NAMPAPALA COMPANY appears as a supplier in Tanzania’s public government-contracting data, but is not matched to an official company registry. Treat it as a lead to investigate, not a confirmed company.

11

Contracts

7

Gov. buyers

TZS 46.5M

Disclosed value

2025–2026

Active years

Procurement

Awarding bodies

The government bodies that awarded contracts to NAMPAPALA COMPANY.

  • KILIMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL4
  • CHANIKA PRIMARY SCHOOL2
  • AMANA PRIMARY SCHOOL1
  • KOMBO PRIMARY SCHOOL1
  • AMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL1

Procurement

Individual contracts

  • Public contract award

    CHANIKA PRIMARY SCHOOL · 11 July 2025

    TZS 13.0M
  • Public contract award

    AMANA PRIMARY SCHOOL · 2 July 2025

    TZS 8.0M
  • Public contract award

    KOMBO PRIMARY SCHOOL · 16 January 2025

    TZS 5.9M
  • Public contract award

    CHANIKA PRIMARY SCHOOL · 18 February 2025

    TZS 5.5M
  • Public contract award

    KILIMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 6 January 2026

    TZS 3.6M
  • Public contract award

    KILIMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 3 March 2025

    TZS 2.2M
  • Public contract award

    ZANAKI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 27 March 2025

    TZS 2.1M
  • Public contract award

    GONGO LA MBOTO JESHINI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 27 March 2025

    TZS 1.8M
  • Public contract award

    AMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 24 June 2025

    TZS 1.6M
  • Public contract award

    KILIMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 13 June 2025

    TZS 1.4M
  • Public contract award

    KILIMANI PRIMARY SCHOOL · 13 June 2025

    TZS 1.4M

Network

Vendors connected to NAMPAPALA COMPANY

Other vendors that won contracts from the same government bodies — the procurement network around NAMPAPALA COMPANY.

About this record

This page is built from open government-procurement data (Open Contracting / OCDS) for Tanzania. It records a vendor that won public contracts but that we have not confirmed against an official company registry — so it carries no registration number, status, or ownership data, and a deliberately low confidence score. Fylings shows these unverified vendors, clearly labelled, because a complete picture of public spending includes every supplier — not only the ones we can verify. If this vendor is later matched to a registered company, this record is replaced by its verified company page.