Government vendor
UFAHAMU WOMEN GROUP
Procurement record only, not registry-verified. UFAHAMU WOMEN GROUP appears as a supplier in Tanzania’s public government-contracting data, but is not matched to an official company registry. Treat it as a lead to investigate, not a confirmed company.
7
Contracts
4
Gov. buyers
TZS 562M
Disclosed value
2024–2025
Active years
Procurement
Awarding bodies
The government bodies that awarded contracts to UFAHAMU WOMEN GROUP.
- KINONDONI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL3
- INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WORKS2
- BUHIGWE DISTRICT COUNCIL1
- TANROADS - KIGOMA REGIONAL OFFICE1
Procurement
Individual contracts
- TZS 250M
Public contract award
BUHIGWE DISTRICT COUNCIL · 8 July 2025
- TZS 131M
Public contract award
INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WORKS · 7 November 2025
- TZS 96.7M
Public contract award
TANROADS - KIGOMA REGIONAL OFFICE · 2 March 2025
- TZS 38.0M
Public contract award
KINONDONI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL · 21 November 2024
- TZS 24.0M
Public contract award
KINONDONI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL · 1 October 2024
- TZS 14.0M
Public contract award
INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WORKS · 15 October 2025
- TZS 8.3M
Public contract award
KINONDONI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL · 21 March 2025
Network
Vendors connected to UFAHAMU WOMEN GROUP
Other vendors that won contracts from the same government bodies, the procurement network around UFAHAMU WOMEN GROUP.
- MAC AGENCY (T) LIMITED2 shared buyers · 2 awards
- THEO and N TRADING COMPANY2 shared buyers · 2 awards
- MPOZEMENYA ENTERPRISES and GENERAL SUPPLIERS2 shared buyers · 2 awards
- RITO ENTERPRISES1 shared buyer · 21 awards
- SINAI AUTO SERVICES COMPANY1 shared buyer · 9 awards
- MAGIBA GENERAL INVESTMENT.1 shared buyer · 6 awards
- SOUTHERN LINK LTD.1 shared buyer · 5 awards
- MBUYA'S CONTRACTORS COMPANY LIMITED1 shared buyer · 4 awards
About this record
This page is built from open government-procurement data (Open Contracting / OCDS) for Tanzania. It records a vendor that won public contracts but that we have not confirmed against an official company registry, so it carries no registration number, status, or ownership data, and a deliberately low confidence score. Fylings shows these unverified vendors, clearly labelled, because a complete picture of public spending includes every supplier, not only the ones we can verify. If this vendor is later matched to a registered company, this record is replaced by its verified company page.